Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02927
Original file (BC 2014 02927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02927

						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reentry (RE) code of "2C" (Involuntarily separated with an 
honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without service 
characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter 
military service.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He did not receive proper preparation from the recruiters as to 
what was expected of him during the nine week Indoctrination 
course.  The Physical Ability Stamina Test (PAST) was not 
sufficient in providing what actually occurs in the course.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 28 Dec 10, the applicant commenced his enlistment in the 
Regular Air Force.

In a Self-Initiation Elimination (SIE) Policy Letter dated 
13 Ju1 10, the applicant acknowledged that if he self-eliminated 
from training for any reason that he could be administratively 
discharged without further counseling/rehabilitation.

AETC Form 125A, Record of Administrative Training Action, dated 18 
Mar 11, reflects the applicant declined to retry taking the 
Pararescue Development Course.

On 7 Apr 11, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was 
recommending his discharge from the Air Force for entry-level 
performance or conduct, specifically reluctance to make the effort 
necessary to meet Air Force standards of conduct and duty 
performance.  The specific reason for the discharge action was the 
applicant self-eliminated from the Pararescue Development Course 
citing he lacked the desire and doubted his ability to complete 
the course.

The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification and waived 
his right to consult military legal counsel and to submit a 
statement in his own behalf.

On 11 Apr 11, the legal office reviewed the case and found it 
legally sufficient and recommended the applicant be furnished an 
entry-level separation.

On 13 Apr 11, the discharge authority concurred and directed the 
applicant be discharged with an entry-level separation.

On 19 Apr 11, the applicant was furnished an entry-level 
separation with uncharacterized service, with an RE code of 2C 
(Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-
level separation without characterization of service) and an SPD 
code of JGA, and was credited with 3 months and 22 days of total 
active service.   


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an 
error or an injustice.  On 29 Aug 12, AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in 
the USAF, was changed modifying the RE code 3A to include a 
definition of first-term airman involuntarily separated (entry-
level) for inability to satisfactorily progress in a required 
training program without characterization of service; or a first-
term Airman involuntarily separated for failure to progress in 
military training required to be qualified for service with the 
Air Force or for performance of primary duties.  The new 
definition of the RE code 3A was not retroactive.  Although DPSOA 
feels there are equity issues for airman receiving a RE code 2C 
who were separated for inability to satisfactorily progress in a 
required training program without characterization of service or 
failure to progress in military training required to be qualified 
for service with the Air Force or for performance of primary 
duties before the new change in the AFI, the applicant was not 
separated under either of these provisions, but was separated for 
"reluctance to make the effort necessary to meet Air Force 
standards of conduct and duty performance" based on self-
eliminating from training.  The applicant's involuntary separation 
notification memorandum noted he was removed from training and 
processed for separation because he self-eliminated from training.  
Therefore, the applicant’s request should be denied because the 
AFI in effect at the time of his separation required all airmen 
being separated with an entry-level separation with 
uncharacterized service to receive the RE code of 2C.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 7 Jan 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2014-02927 in Executive Session on 19 May 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC_2014-02927 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 Jul 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 19 Nov 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Jan 15.




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05611

    Original file (BC 2013 05611.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 22 Nov 13, after serving four months and seven days, the applicant was furnished an ELS with uncharacterized service, and issued an RE Code of 2C and Narrative Reason for Separation of “Entry Level Performance or Conduct.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02863

    Original file (BC 2014 02863.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02863 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to 3A (first-term airman involuntarily separated entry-level for inability to satisfactorily progress in a required training program without characterization of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04281

    Original file (BC 2014 04281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 Sep 12, he was discharged with a RE code of 2C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his RE code to the 1# series. On 25 Sep 12, the 37th Training Group Commander (37 TRG) directed he be discharged with an ELS for “reluctance to make the effort necessary to meet Air Force standards of conduct and duty performance.” AFI 36-2606, chapter 5 states not to separate airmen in the RE code 1# series except RE code “1J” which denotes...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01755

    Original file (BC-2012-01755.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01755 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service," be changed to allow reentry in the military. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02721

    Original file (BC 2014 02721.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 submitted with the applicant’s request has RE code 2C. AFPC/DPSOY will provide the applicant a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with RE code 2C, unless otherwise directed by the Board. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 19 Jun 14, he was discharged with a reentry code of 3K (Secretarial Authority).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00922

    Original file (BC-2012-00922.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS the provisions of AFI AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00922 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service," be changed to allow reentry in the military. On 12 Aug 2011, he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02716

    Original file (BC-2011-02716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant did not provide any evidence that an error or injustice that occurred in the processing of his discharge...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04729

    Original file (BC 2013 04729.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Service RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04729 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code "2C" (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without service characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial noting the applicant has not provided any evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03703

    Original file (BC-2011-03703.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03703 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized discharge be changed to an honorable discharge and his reentry (RE) code of 2C (entry-level separation with uncharacterized service) be changed to an RE code that would allow his immediate reenlistment. Therefore, his character of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02995

    Original file (BC-2011-02995.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSOA states the applicant does not provide any evidence that supports a correction to his RE code. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Oct 11 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...